Tags

Carlos Pedraza's Avatar

Carlos Pedraza

18 May, 2010 11:25 PM via web

Here's my problem: I've tagged some items "male" and others "female." When I use the filter at the top of the page for male, all the items tagged female also appear. I expect this is the case because the word female includes 'male' in it. However, from a tagging standpoint this is unacceptable and renders tagging useless.

  1. 2 Posted by pnooren on 19 May, 2010 02:56 AM

    pnooren's Avatar

    Not necessarily. I ran into the same problem a couple of days ago, because I use the following tags to indicate priority: i ; ii ; iii. If I select priority i, all other tasks will also pop up.

    I managed to work around this "problem" by indicating priorities with letters from the alphabet.

    Also, I can imagine that a lot of users find this feature desirable: for instance, when you have the contexts 'pc', 'pc/email', 'pc/website', 'pc/programming', selecting the tag 'pc' will bring up all tasks where a computer is required, and allows for further drilling down. (effectively allowing different levels in tags)

    That being said, from those two tags that you mention I see why this bothers you. A not so elegant, but effective solution would be to change the tags to [m] and [f] (including brackets).

    I'm not sure whether or not the developers are looking to change this tag behavior. @Elbert, could you shine a light on this matter? Do I have to change my tag system in the near future?

  2. 3 Posted by martin.tyler on 19 May, 2010 01:03 PM

    martin.tyler's Avatar

    although there is a use for it (to create a hierarchy of tags) there is nothing in the gui that indicates this is the behaviour - so it is either a bug, or if it is intended it should be more obvious that is what it is doing

    i would prefer (as mentioned elsewhere) a more explicit tag hierarchy feature

  3. Support Staff 4 Posted by Christiane Magee on 25 Jun, 2010 03:56 PM

    Christiane Magee's Avatar

    the tag library does need to be more explicit. We are improving up on this. Thanks for contributing your thoughts in this.

    C

  4. David McLaughlin closed this discussion on 04 Feb, 2011 01:43 AM.

Comments are currently closed for this discussion. You can start a new one.

Recent Discussions

07 Mar, 2012 04:47 PM
08 Dec, 2011 10:32 PM
01 Apr, 2012 11:26 PM
07 May, 2012 05:17 PM
07 Oct, 2011 02:00 AM